The Politics of Fear: How Netanyahu’s Iran Nuclear Claims Became a Global Power Game

By Dr. Pooyan Ghamari

For more than two decades, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has issued one consistent warning to the world: Iran is on the brink of building a nuclear bomb. He has repeated this message from the podiums of the United Nations, the halls of the U.S. Congress, and global press briefings — always with urgency, and always with certainty.

And yet, as of 2025, Iran has no nuclear weapon.

Despite thousands of inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), despite years of heavy sanctions, cyber sabotage, assassinations, and surveillance, the feared Iranian bomb has not materialized. So the question must be asked — was the threat real, or was it a calculated geopolitical tool?

The Timeline of Alarm: A Strategic Refrain

Since at least 2003, Netanyahu has been warning the world that Iran is only months away from a nuclear breakout. Here are just a few of his most notable declarations:

• 2009: Netanyahu warned the Obama administration that Iran was nearing nuclear capability.

• 2012: In his now-infamous UN speech, he presented a cartoon bomb illustration and dramatically drew a “red line” on it — predicting Iran would be capable of producing a bomb by mid-2013.

• 2015: He fiercely opposed the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action), calling it a historic mistake that would “pave Iran’s path to a bomb.”

• 2018: Netanyahu unveiled what he called a secret Iranian nuclear archive — already known to intelligence agencies — and used it to argue for U.S. withdrawal from the Iran deal.

• 2021–2024: Despite the IAEA confirming Iran had not weaponized its enriched uranium, Netanyahu continued asserting that Iran was “weeks away” from developing a bomb.

These claims often came without evidence, or with selective interpretation of intelligence, but they shaped global policy. They also reinforced Netanyahu’s image as the lone sentinel standing against existential threats to Israel — a role he carefully cultivated both domestically and abroad.

Why Keep Repeating It?

Netanyahu is not careless. His repetition of the Iran nuclear narrative is deliberate — and it serves multiple strategic objectives:

1. Consolidating Domestic Power

Framing Israel’s existence as constantly under threat keeps the public focused outward — not inward. During times of domestic political scandal or electoral vulnerability, raising the Iranian threat often reunifies political blocs, silences opposition, and reignites nationalistic sentiment. The external enemy becomes a convenient distraction from internal challenges.

2. Controlling the Regional Chessboard

Israel’s regional dominance depends heavily on being perceived as the West’s frontline ally in the Middle East. By continually warning of Iran’s nuclear intentions, Netanyahu ensures that Israel remains indispensable to U.S. military and intelligence priorities, thereby securing billions in aid, advanced weapons systems, and diplomatic backing.

3. Blocking Diplomatic Paths

The Iran nuclear deal was never just about uranium. It was about reintegration of Iran into the global economy — a prospect that Netanyahu sees as a threat. A normalized Iran could challenge Israeli dominance in regional diplomacy, energy markets, and influence over the West. By derailing diplomacy, Netanyahu protects strategic exclusivity.

4. Weaponizing Fear for Leverage

Fear is the currency of control. By positioning Israel as constantly under existential threat, Netanyahu is able to justify pre-emptive military actions, lobby aggressively in Washington, and frame criticism of Israeli policy — even unrelated to Iran — as dangerously naïve or disloyal.

Corruption, Cronyism, and Financial Gain

But the Iran narrative is not just about geopolitics. It is also about profit, corruption, and elite enrichment. Each time Netanyahu reignites fear of war or nuclear breakout, the consequences ripple through the global financial system — and they’re not accidental.

• Defense contractors and weapons manufacturers see their stock prices rise immediately following Netanyahu’s speeches. Companies tied to missile systems, cyber warfare, and surveillance technology — many with direct lobbying ties to Israeli and U.S. officials — benefit from every surge in tension.

• Israeli insiders, including political allies, military-industrial stakeholders, and Netanyahu’s extended network, are often positioned to gain from arms deals, budget inflations, and security contracts.

• Oil markets respond predictably to Netanyahu’s warnings. Every claim of conflict spikes prices, benefiting hedge funds, energy speculators, and even state-controlled actors who are prepared to capitalize.

More disturbingly, timing often overlaps between political events and financial maneuvers. Investigative reporters have identified patterns where influential groups trade on defense and energy stocks just before major policy speeches — a pattern that suggests coordinated economic manipulation. This has raised alarms not just in Israel, but across global watchdog institutions.

While the public is distracted by fear, a select class profits — repeatedly and silently.

The Cost of Crying Wolf

What’s most dangerous is that this isn’t just a political tactic — it has real-world consequences:

• Diplomatic fatigue: Over time, exaggerated warnings lose credibility. Allies grow skeptical. Intelligence agencies become cautious. This dilutes genuine security concerns and hampers coordination when real threats do emerge.

• Empowering Iran’s hardliners: Ironically, Netanyahu’s aggressiveness weakens moderates in Iran. When diplomacy is undermined and threats are constant, Tehran’s internal politics swing toward militarization and secrecy, rather than cooperation.

• Triggering arms races: Repeated claims of imminent nuclear breakout push countries like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Turkey to reconsider their own strategic programs. The Middle East risks becoming a region not of peacebuilding but of proliferation.

• Risking war: By setting red lines and treating unverified intelligence as fact, Netanyahu’s strategy edges the region toward conflict — with civilians, economies, and future generations bearing the cost.

The Global Echo Chamber

This isn’t just about Israel and Iran. It’s about how fear narratives manipulate the West, particularly the U.S. and Europe. Netanyahu has mastered the art of speaking directly to American fears — evoking 9/11, Islamic extremism, and the Holocaust to anchor his narrative in Western psychology.

And it works.

Every time he warns of Iran, media headlines shift. Politicians rush to pledge loyalty. Sanctions are strengthened, arms sales increase, and diplomatic windows close.

The result? The U.S. finds itself entangled in a narrative it no longer controls, dragged into regional conflicts and tensions that benefit few outside the weapons manufacturers, ideological hardliners, and power brokers.

Europe, too, is caught in the bind — torn between honoring nuclear agreements (like the JCPOA) and appeasing Washington and Tel Aviv. This weakens European strategic autonomy and undermines EU diplomacy as a serious global force.

The Credibility Crisis

Even within Israel’s own defense community, dissent is growing. Former Mossad and Shin Bet officials have expressed concerns that Netanyahu is distorting intelligence for political ends. The weaponization of truth, they argue, erodes Israel’s long-term security more than Iran’s enrichment programs.

Meanwhile, the IAEA continues to confirm that, while Iran’s nuclear program has expanded, there is still no conclusive evidence of an active weaponization effort.

The cycle continues — driven not by truth, but by the benefits of belief.

What the World Must Now Realize

It is no longer sufficient to ask whether Iran poses a nuclear threat.

The question must now be: Who benefits from the perception of that threat — and at what cost?

The answer is uncomfortable but clear.

By playing a high-stakes psychological game with the world’s most powerful nations, Netanyahu has not only shaped Israeli policy — he has effectively co-authored Western foreign policy.

The damage is not hypothetical.

It is visible in broken diplomatic deals, lost economic opportunities, rising regional tensions, and the erosion of truth.

From Fear to Strategic Maturity

The time has come for the U.S., Europe, and the broader international community to move beyond fear-based diplomacy.

The world cannot afford another decade of being manipulated by theatrics masquerading as strategy.

If global decision-makers are to reclaim agency, they must demand verifiable intelligence, measured responses, and a return to evidence-based policy.

Because fear is easy to sell.

But freedom — and truth — demand courage.

• Share:
•